Print ISSN: 1547-6286; Online ISSN: 1555-8584


Recommend RNA Biology to your librarian for 2008. Download form here.

Sign up for Table of Contents Alerts!

home subscribe search archive forthcoming

Email this page Print this page

Review

RNA Chaperones, RNA Annealers and RNA Helicases

Lukas Rajkowitsch, Doris Chen, Sabine Stampfl, Katharina Semrad, Christina Waldsich, Oliver Mayer, Michael F. Jantsch, Robert Konrat, Udo Bläsi and Renée Schroeder

volume 4 | issue 3

july-december

This is an open-access article

 Download PDF

If the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.

RNA molecules face difficulties when folding into their native structures. In the cell, proteins can assist RNAs in reaching their functionally active states by binding and stabilizing a specific structure or, in a quite opposite way, by interacting in a non-specific manner. These proteins can either facilitate RNA-RNA interactions in a reaction termed RNA annealing, or they can resolve non-functional inhibitory structures. The latter is defined as “RNA chaperone activity” and is the main topic of this review. Here we define RNA chaperone activity in a stringent way and we review those proteins for which RNA chaperone activity has been clearly demonstrated. These proteins belong to quite diverse families such as hnRNPs, histone-like proteins, ribosomal proteins, cold shock domain proteins and viral nucleocapsid proteins. DExD/H-box containing RNA helicases are discussed as a special family of enzymes that restructure RNA or RNPs in an ATP-dependent manner. We further address the different mechanisms RNA chaperones might use to promote folding including the recently proposed theory of protein disorder as a key element in triggering RNA-protein interactions. Finally, we present a new website for proteins with RNA chaperone activity which compiles all the information on these proteins with the perspective to promote the understanding of their activity.

Authors

Lukas Rajkowitsch

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Doris Chen

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Sabine Stampfl

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Katharina Semrad

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Christina Waldsich

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Oliver Mayer

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Michael F. Jantsch

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Robert Konrat

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Udo Bläsi

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria

Renée Schroeder

Max F. Perutz Laboratories; University of Vienna; Vienna, Austria


This is an open-access article

 Download PDF

If the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.