Recommend RNA Biology to your librarian for 2008. Download form here.
Sign up for Table of Contents Alerts!
Email this page
Print this page
Research Paper
Discrimination of Non-Protein-Coding Transcripts from Protein-Coding mRNA
MC Frith, TL Bailey, T Kasukawa, F Mignone, SK Kummerfeld, M Madera, S Sunkara, M Furuno, CJ Bult, J Quackenbush, C Kai, J Kawai, P Carninci, Y Hayashizaki, G Pesole, JS Mattick
volume 3 | issue 1
january/february/march 2006Pages: 40 - 48
We now provide open access to journal articles published online for one year or more. This article may be downloaded at the following link:
Download PDF If the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.
Several recent studies indicate that mammals and other organisms produce large numbers of RNA transcripts that do not correspond to known genes. It has been suggested that these transcripts do not encode proteins, but may instead function as RNAs. However, discrimination of coding and noncoding transcripts is not straightforward, and different laboratories have used different methods, whose ability to perform this discrimination is unclear. In this study, we examine ten bioinformatic methods that assess protein-coding potential and compare their ability and congruency in the discrimination of noncoding from coding sequences, based on four underlying principles: open reading frame size, sequence similarity to known proteins or protein domains, statistical models of protein-coding sequence, and synonymous versus nonsynonymous substitution rates. Despite these different approaches, the methods show broad concordance, suggesting that coding and noncoding transcripts can, in general, be reliably discriminated, and that many of the recently discovered extra-genic transcripts are indeed noncoding. Comparison of the methods indicates reasons for unreliable predictions, and approaches to increase confidence further. Conversely and surprisingly, our analyses also provide evidence that as much as ~10% of entries in the manually curated protein database Swiss-Prot are erroneous translations of actually noncoding transcripts.
We now provide open access to journal articles published online for one year or more. This article may be downloaded at the following link:
Download PDF If the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.