Recommend Cell Cycle to your librarian for 2008. Download form here.

Sign up for Table of Contents Alerts.

home subscribe search archive forthcoming

Email this page Print this page

Brief Report

Effect of valproic acid on radiation-induced DNA damage in euchromatic and heterochromatic compartments

KN Harikrishnan, Tom C. Karagiannis, Maggie Z. Chow and Assam El-Osta

volume 7 | issue 4

15 February 2008
Pages: 468 - 476

Purchase article for $19

Subscribe to this journal for $129/year

The distinction between heterochromatin and euchromatin in the double-strand break (DSB) damage pathway is of interest, recent reports indicate that chromatin is not created equally nor is it acquiescent to DSBs. Using the classical histone deacetylase inhibitor, Trichostatin A, we have previously demonstrated that chromatin represents a heterogeneous substrate with respect to histone tail modification by histone deacetylase inhibitors and consequent responses to DNA damage and repair. Here, we extended the initial findings by investigating the radiation sensitizing properties of the widely used antiepileptic, valproic acid. Clonogenic survival assays confirm that valproic acid is an efficient sensitizer of radiation-induced cell death. The radiosensitizing effect is correlated with valproic acid-mediated histone hyperacetylation, chromatin decondensation and enhanced formation of radiation-induced γH2AX preferentially on euchromatic alleles. Heterochromatin was much more resistant to histone tail modification, changes in chromatin architecture and DNA damage. These findings are consolidated by studies with the structurally related analogue, valpromide, which does not inhibit histone deacetylase enzymes. At a relatively low concentration (1 mM) valpromide did not cause chromatin modifications and radiation sensitivity, providing further evidence that the radiation sensitizing properties of valproic acid are at least in part, due to histone modification-dependent effects on euchromatin. When higher concentrations (5 mM) were used, both compounds resulted in significant radiation sensitivity, albeit, with differing efficacy (dose modifying factors of 1.5 and 1.2 for valproic acid and valpromide, respectively). The findings imply that histone-modification independent mechanisms also contribute to the radiation sensitizing properties of valproic acid. Overall, our findings are consistent with the emerging interest in the use histone deacetylase inhibitors in combination with radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer.

Authors

KN Harikrishnan

The Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct; Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Tom C. Karagiannis

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Maggie Z. Chow

The Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct; Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Assam El-Osta

The Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct; Prahran, Victoria, Australia


Purchase article for $19

Subscribe to this journal for $129/year