Abstract:
The search for new therapeutic agents that are effective against cancer has been difficult and expensive. The activity of anticancer candidate agents against human cancer-derived cell lines in immunocompromised mice is an important tool in this search. Because ATP is a naturally occurring small molecule, its radiolabeled form poses many advantages as a potential anticancer therapeutic agent. We previously found that a single, low-dose intravenous injection of [32P]ATP inhibited the growth of xenografted tumors in nude mice for up to several weeks. The current study describes the biodistribution and the results and advantages of multi-dose administration of this potential drug. Future studies should investigate the mechanism involved in the possible use of [32P]ATP as a cytotoxic agent that homes naturally to the tumor microenvironment.
Received: February 29, 2012; Accepted: March 8, 2012; Published Online: May 15, 2012
Mammalian cancer cells are efficiently killed by β particles emitted from radionuclides. The ability of 131I to home to thyroid tissue has been exploited for decades as a therapeutic strategy against thyroid cancer and Graves’ disease, and this strategy is still used in over 50% of thyroid cancer patients in the USA today.1 Similarly, 131I-Bexxar and 90Y-Zevalin are used to treat non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma based on antibodies against the CD20 cell surface antigen.2,3 Moreover, 90Y-radiolabeled somatostatin is also used to treat neuroendocrine tumors.4 [32P] ATP emits electrons with an energy level intermediate between that of 90Y and 131I; these electrons have a path length of up to 5 mm in tissues. Thus, each electron can penetrate thousands of cells. The resulting cross-fire results in a “bystander effect” that greatly amplifies the killing power of each 32P atom in or near a tumor. In addition, 32P possesses a much longer half-life than 90Y or 131I: this is an advantage, since radioactivity levels in tumors do not diminish as rapidly from natural decay.
Anticancer therapeutics are often assessed by their ability to inhibit xenografted tumors in nude mice.5,6 Successful drugs tested in this fashion have included Rituxan and other antibodies directed against cell surface molecules.7 Examples of drugs designed against broader targets include the anti-VEGF antibody Avastin, which inhibits the establishment of the tumor microenvironment, and cisplatin, which targets rapidly growing cells.8 Small molecules present many advantages as anticancer therapeutics, such as better tumor penetration and low immunogenicity. Previously, we reported that a single, low-dose intravenous injection of [32P] ATP inhibited the growth of xenografted tumors in nude mice.9 In order to make this assay more clinically relevant, we ensured that our xenografts had become established and well-vascularized prior to dose administration; in this setting, a narrow window of dose-effectiveness was observed. The current report expands on this previous study by describing the biodistribution of [32P] ATP in nude mice bearing HeLa-derived xenografted tumors as well as by exploring the effectiveness multi-dose regimens of [32P] ATP.
[32P]ATP was assessed for its ex vivo pharmacokinetics in nude mice bearing HeLa-derived xenografted tumors. Mice were injected subcutaneously with HeLa cells on day 1; 7.5 μCi of [32P]ATP were subsequently injected intravenously through the tail vein on day 9. The percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) revealed high levels of radiolabeled ATP in the liver and kidney at one hour post-injection (
| Organ | 1 Hour | 5 Hours | 1 Day | 2 Days | 5 Days | 9 Days |
| Serum | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
| Blood | 1.11 ± 0.19 | 1.05 ± 0.19 | 0.73 ± 0.22 | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
| Heart | 3.69 ± 0.85 | 3.13 ± 1.37 | 2.09 ± 0.57 | 1.26 ± 0.31 | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.51 ± 0.16 |
| Lung | 3.21 ± 0.26 | 2.21 ± 1.03 | 2.67 ± 0.18 | 1.61 ± 0.50 | 0.96 ± 0.06 | 0.05 ± 0.08 |
| Tumor | 1.34 ± 0.51 | 1.08 ± 0.28 | 0.96 ± 0.56 | 0.82 ± 0.27 | 0.99 ± 0.12 | 0.71 ± 0.21 |
| Liver | 8.08 ± 2.12 | 5.19 ± 0.58 | 3.30 ± 0.74 | 2.00 ± 0.28 | 1.21 ± 0.09 | 0.74 ± 0.16 |
| Spleen | 3.99 ± 0.68 | 3.70 ± 0.44 | 3.96 ± 1.11 | 1.85 ± 0.31 | 1.57 ± 0.18 | 0.94 ± 0.21 |
| Stomach | 1.65 ± 0.34 | 1.95 ± 0.43 | 1.87 ± 0.21 | 1.19 ± 0.29 | 0.92 ± 0.16 | 0.48 ± 0.15 |
| Sm. Int. | 3.55 ± 0.97 | 3.20 ± 0.88 | 3.61 ± 0.72 | 2.23 ± 0.71 | 1.29 ± 0.09 | 0.76 ± 0.29 |
| Kidney | 6.52 ± 2.78 | 3.68 ± 0.68 | 2.79 ± 0.29 | 1.64 ± 0.04 | 1.18 ± 0.13 | 0.75 ± 0.19 |
| Sternum | 3.78 ± 1.31 | 4.19 ± 1.30 | 2.61 ± 0.80 | 1.89 ± 0.12 | 1.48 ± 0.37 | 1.13 ± 0.13 |
| Muscle | 2.80 ± 0.34 | 3.48 ± 0.80 | 2.38 ± 0.60 | 1.49 ± 0.39 | 0.86 ± 0.28 | 0.86 ± 0.24 |
Results are expressed as the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of tissue plus or minus one standard deviation. Number of mice per time point is three. “Sm.Int.” is small intestine.
Figure 1. Biodistribution of [32P]ATP in organs and xenografted tumors in nude mice. Two million HeLa cells in 0.2 ml of 50% Matrigel were injected into the left rear and right rear flanks of nude mice on day 1. On day 9, these mice received 7.5 µCi of [32P]ATP via tail vein injection in 0.1 ml 1 X HBSS. At each time period of one hour, five hours, one day, two days, five days, or nine days, three mice were sacrificed and the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) was determined for the organs shown by liquid scintillation counting.
Notably, one exception to this trend was the HeLa-derived tumors, with one-hour levels of 1.34 ± 0.51%ID/g that did not decrease significantly by day 9. Interestingly, even though xenografts exhibited lower overall levels of vascularization, as evidenced by the general off-white color of the tumors, than did the liver, kidney or heart; the %ID/g was always higher in tumors than in blood. Once radioactivity was established in xenografts, radioactivity decreased much more slowly than in any other organ (
Figure 2. Retention of the radioisotope over a nine day period. The ratio of the average %ID/g of the organs and xenografted tumors shown in
Previous reports of xenograft growth inhibition by [32P]ATP in nude mice focused on a single dose injected into the tail vein. However, very few drugs used in humans are given as a single dose. This is true, because in most applications, from treating bacterial infections to fighting malignancies, prolonged administration produces superior clinical responses. Therefore, we administered repeated [32P] ATP doses in this study. Nude mice first received two million HeLa cells in 0.2 ml of 50% Matrigel via sub-cutaneous injections into the left-rear and right-rear flanks on day 1. After randomization, one treatment group received a single dose of 2.5 μCi of [32P]ATP on day 9; a second group received a 2.5 μCi dose on days 9 and 16, and the third group received a 2.5 μCi dose on days 9, 16 and 23. Each treatment group was composed of three mice. Tumor volumes were measured daily vs. a control group of four mice that had received no injections of [32P]ATP.
Our previous experiments had shown that significant growth inhibition occurred as early as 6 days post-[32P] ATP injection.9 In the current report, significant growth inhibition was seen in all three treatment groups vs. the control group at 6 days post-injection of the first 2.5 μCi dose (
Figure 3. Inhibition of xenografted tumor growth. HeLa cells (both left and right rear flanks) were used to establish xenografted tumors and were injected subcutaneously on Day 1. After the mice were randomized, one group received one dose of 2.5 µCi of [32P]ATP on day Day 9, one group received a 2.5 µCi dose on both Day 9 and on Day 16, and the third group received a 2.5 µCi dose on Day 9, on Day 16, and on Day 23. Each group had three mice and the tumor volumes were measured daily and compared with a control group of four mice that received no injection of [32P]ATP. Tumor volumes are in mm3.
Figure 4. The level of tumor growth inhibition in mice receiving three doses of 2.5 µCi [32P]ATP vs. the control group. A group of three mice, each bearing two HeLa-derived xenografted tumors, received a 2.5 µCi dose on Day 9, on Day 16, and on Day 23. The tumor volumes were measured daily and compared with a control group of four mice that received no injection of [32P]ATP. The mean and plus/minus one standard deviation is shown and the numbers are P values determined by the two-sided student’s t test. Tumor volumes are in mm3.
The current report confirms that intravenous injection of low doses of [32P]ATP rapidly slows xenografted tumor growth in nude mice for several weeks, although the mechanism responsible for this reproducible finding is not yet understood. Our biodistribution results establish that although levels of [32P]ATP in tumors are initially low relative to normal organs, tumor levels decrease more slowly than in any other tissues. Unlike most potential anticancer drugs, which are based on antibodies or alien chemical compounds, ATP is relatively unique in that it is a completely natural compound, although the vast majority of ATP in humans is intracellular. The initial low level of [32P]ATP that was seen in the xenografted tumor was expected, because the tumors were essentially white in color, demonstrating inferior levels of vascularization when compared with the red blood-rich organs, such as the liver, kidney, heart and others. This inhibition of xenografted tumor may result from direct cytotoxic ability of the radioisotope, significant injury to B-cell lymphocytes and natural killer cells or, possibly, the well-documented phenomenon of low-dose radiation hypersensitivity.10 Hematoxylin and eosin staining of sections of the xenografted tumors showed no immune cells present in tumors from mice that received the highest doses of [32P]ATP, while the small, disrupted tumors examined from mice receiving optimal [32P]ATP doses did contain infiltrating immune cells (data not shown).
In the 1920s, Otto Warburg showed that tumor tissues metabolize glucose at a rate approximately ten times greater than do normal tissues under aerobic conditions.11,12 This finding became known as the Warburg effect and is centered on the mechanisms used by cancer cells to generate energy for the cell in the form of ATP, which was first discovered in 1929.11 The gamma phosphate of each ATP molecule is readily removed and restored over 1,000 times per day in the normal metabolic functions of cells, and the quantity of the ATP turnover is so great that it is roughly equal to a human’s total body weight.13
Inorganic elemental 32P has been used to treat essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera, and up to 15 mCi of inorganic 32P-sodium phosphate have been administered to each patient with chronic leukemia.14 Levels of organic 32P used here correspond, on a mouse to human weight basis, favorably to the levels of inorganic 32P that historically have been used previously to treat humans. In the United States, several ongoing clinical trials utilize inorganic 32P; moreover, nanotechnology approaches have been attempted to target this radioisotope against various cancer types. However, to our knowledge, organic 32P (as in [32P]ATP) has never been tested as a therapeutic agent in any disease.
Extracellular cold ATP occurs spontaneously at concentrations above 100 μM in xenografted mouse tumors, but it is undetectable in healthy tissues.15 Therefore, [32P]ATP may constitute a naturally targeted anticancer therapeutic agent, perhaps due to cancer-related inflammation and the energy-demanding extracellular tumor microenvironment.16 Additional potential advantages of [32P] ATP as an anticancer agent include its ready availability, low cost, ease of handling and transport. and relatively long half-life. Furthermore, there is the consensus that the smaller the anticancer molecule, the better the tumor penetration.17 In this context, [32P]ATP has a molecular weight of only 508 Daltons, making it much smaller than most anticancer agents. Finally, its apparent tumor-homing ability and the apparent requirement of the tumor microenvironment for exogenous ATP make [32P]ATP an attractive potential anticancer treatment strategy.
This work supported by GI SPORE Pilot Project Grant CA062924 and Grant CA133012. We wish to thank Theodore DeWeese for valuable input.
|
Jump to Section
|