Extra Views

[32P]ATP inhibits the growth of xenografted tumors in nude mice

Volume 11, Issue 10   May 15, 2012
Pages 1878 - 1882
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.19955
Keywords: [32P]ATP, mice, tumorinhibition, xenografts
Authors: Yulan Cheng, Srinivasan Senthamizhchelvan, Rachana Agarwal, Gilbert M. Green, Ronnie C. Mease, George Sgouros, David L. Huso, Martin G. Pomper, Stephen J. Meltzer and John M. Abraham

View affiliations

Abstract:
The search for new therapeutic agents that are effective against cancer has been difficult and expensive. The activity of anticancer candidate agents against human cancer-derived cell lines in immunocompromised mice is an important tool in this search. Because ATP is a naturally occurring small molecule, its radiolabeled form poses many advantages as a potential anticancer therapeutic agent. We previously found that a single, low-dose intravenous injection of [32P]ATP inhibited the growth of xenografted tumors in nude mice for up to several weeks. The current study describes the biodistribution and the results and advantages of multi-dose administration of this potential drug. Future studies should investigate the mechanism involved in the possible use of [32P]ATP as a cytotoxic agent that homes naturally to the tumor microenvironment.

Received: February 29, 2012; Accepted: March 8, 2012; Published Online: May 15, 2012

Preview:



Full Text

Introduction



Mammalian cancer cells are efficiently killed by β particles emitted from radionuclides. The ability of 131I to home to thyroid tissue has been exploited for decades as a therapeutic strategy against thyroid cancer and Graves’ disease, and this strategy is still used in over 50% of thyroid cancer patients in the USA today.1 Similarly, 131I-Bexxar and 90Y-Zevalin are used to treat non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma based on antibodies against the CD20 cell surface antigen.2,3 Moreover, 90Y-radiolabeled somatostatin is also used to treat neuroendocrine tumors.4 [32P] ATP emits electrons with an energy level intermediate between that of 90Y and 131I; these electrons have a path length of up to 5 mm in tissues. Thus, each electron can penetrate thousands of cells. The resulting cross-fire results in a “bystander effect” that greatly amplifies the killing power of each 32P atom in or near a tumor. In addition, 32P possesses a much longer half-life than 90Y or 131I: this is an advantage, since radioactivity levels in tumors do not diminish as rapidly from natural decay.

Anticancer therapeutics are often assessed by their ability to inhibit xenografted tumors in nude mice.5,6 Successful drugs tested in this fashion have included Rituxan and other antibodies directed against cell surface molecules.7 Examples of drugs designed against broader targets include the anti-VEGF antibody Avastin, which inhibits the establishment of the tumor microenvironment, and cisplatin, which targets rapidly growing cells.8 Small molecules present many advantages as anticancer therapeutics, such as better tumor penetration and low immunogenicity. Previously, we reported that a single, low-dose intravenous injection of [32P] ATP inhibited the growth of xenografted tumors in nude mice.9 In order to make this assay more clinically relevant, we ensured that our xenografts had become established and well-vascularized prior to dose administration; in this setting, a narrow window of dose-effectiveness was observed. The current report expands on this previous study by describing the biodistribution of [32P] ATP in nude mice bearing HeLa-derived xenografted tumors as well as by exploring the effectiveness multi-dose regimens of [32P] ATP.

Results



Biodistribution of [<sup>32</sup>P]ATP.

[32P]ATP was assessed for its ex vivo pharmacokinetics in nude mice bearing HeLa-derived xenografted tumors. Mice were injected subcutaneously with HeLa cells on day 1; 7.5 μCi of [32P]ATP were subsequently injected intravenously through the tail vein on day 9. The percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) revealed high levels of radiolabeled ATP in the liver and kidney at one hour post-injection (Table 1 and Fig. 1); however, these levels declined rapidly. For example, from its highest level of 8.08 ± 2.12 %ID/g at one hour post-injection, a consistent and steady decline of hepatic [32P]ATP occurred, falling to 0.74 ± 0.16%ID/g on day 9. The kidney also showed a rapid decline, falling from 6.52 ± 2.78 %ID/g at one hour post-injection to 0.75 ± 0.19 %ID/g on day 9. Similarly, many organs fell from relatively high %ID/g [32P]ATP levels at one hour post-injection to much lower levels on
day 9.

<b>Table 1.</b> Biodistribution of [<sup>32</sup>P]ATP in tumor-bearing mice
Organ 1 Hour 5 Hours 1 Day 2 Days 5 Days 9 Days
Serum 0.55 ± 0.05 0.37 ± 0.09 0.26 ± 0.04 0.19 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.02
Blood 1.11 ± 0.19 1.05 ± 0.19 0.73 ± 0.22 0.42 ± 0.05 0.24 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.03
Heart 3.69 ± 0.85 3.13 ± 1.37 2.09 ± 0.57 1.26 ± 0.31 0.92 ± 0.06 0.51 ± 0.16
Lung 3.21 ± 0.26 2.21 ± 1.03 2.67 ± 0.18 1.61 ± 0.50 0.96 ± 0.06 0.05 ± 0.08
Tumor 1.34 ± 0.51 1.08 ± 0.28 0.96 ± 0.56 0.82 ± 0.27 0.99 ± 0.12 0.71 ± 0.21
Liver 8.08 ± 2.12 5.19 ± 0.58 3.30 ± 0.74 2.00 ± 0.28 1.21 ± 0.09 0.74 ± 0.16
Spleen 3.99 ± 0.68 3.70 ± 0.44 3.96 ± 1.11 1.85 ± 0.31 1.57 ± 0.18 0.94 ± 0.21
Stomach 1.65 ± 0.34 1.95 ± 0.43 1.87 ± 0.21 1.19 ± 0.29 0.92 ± 0.16 0.48 ± 0.15
Sm. Int. 3.55 ± 0.97 3.20 ± 0.88 3.61 ± 0.72 2.23 ± 0.71 1.29 ± 0.09 0.76 ± 0.29
Kidney 6.52 ± 2.78 3.68 ± 0.68 2.79 ± 0.29 1.64 ± 0.04 1.18 ± 0.13 0.75 ± 0.19
Sternum 3.78 ± 1.31 4.19 ± 1.30 2.61 ± 0.80 1.89 ± 0.12 1.48 ± 0.37 1.13 ± 0.13
Muscle 2.80 ± 0.34 3.48 ± 0.80 2.38 ± 0.60 1.49 ± 0.39 0.86 ± 0.28 0.86 ± 0.24

Results are expressed as the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of tissue plus or minus one standard deviation. Number of mice per time point is three. “Sm.Int.” is small intestine.

Figure 1. Biodistribution of [32P]ATP in organs and xenografted tumors in nude mice. Two million HeLa cells in 0.2 ml of 50% Matrigel were injected into the left rear and right rear flanks of nude mice on day 1. On day 9, these mice received 7.5 µCi of [32P]ATP via tail vein injection in 0.1 ml 1 X HBSS. At each time period of one hour, five hours, one day, two days, five days, or nine days, three mice were sacrificed and the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) was determined for the organs shown by liquid scintillation counting.

Notably, one exception to this trend was the HeLa-derived tumors, with one-hour levels of 1.34 ± 0.51%ID/g that did not decrease significantly by day 9. Interestingly, even though xenografts exhibited lower overall levels of vascularization, as evidenced by the general off-white color of the tumors, than did the liver, kidney or heart; the %ID/g was always higher in tumors than in blood. Once radioactivity was established in xenografts, radioactivity decreased much more slowly than in any other organ (Fig. 2). We found that the majority of gamma-32P-phosphate atoms were removed from ATP and incorporated into large cellular molecules, such as DNA and RNA, within 2 hours post-injection (data not shown).

Figure 2. Retention of the radioisotope over a nine day period. The ratio of the average %ID/g of the organs and xenografted tumors shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 are shown at each time point relative to the values that were determined for each organ or tumor at one hour post-injection of [32P]ATP. For ease in viewing, only the ratio lines determined for the xenografted tumors and for the organ nearest in value to the the tumors (stomach) are designated. Notice that all organs had a retention ratio over a nine day period of 31% or less, while the xenografted tumor ratio never decreased below 53%.

Multi-dose inhibition of tumor growth.

Previous reports of xenograft growth inhibition by [32P]ATP in nude mice focused on a single dose injected into the tail vein. However, very few drugs used in humans are given as a single dose. This is true, because in most applications, from treating bacterial infections to fighting malignancies, prolonged administration produces superior clinical responses. Therefore, we administered repeated [32P] ATP doses in this study. Nude mice first received two million HeLa cells in 0.2 ml of 50% Matrigel via sub-cutaneous injections into the left-rear and right-rear flanks on day 1. After randomization, one treatment group received a single dose of 2.5 μCi of [32P]ATP on day 9; a second group received a 2.5 μCi dose on days 9 and 16, and the third group received a 2.5 μCi dose on days 9, 16 and 23. Each treatment group was composed of three mice. Tumor volumes were measured daily vs. a control group of four mice that had received no injections of [32P]ATP.

Our previous experiments had shown that significant growth inhibition occurred as early as 6 days post-[32P] ATP injection.9 In the current report, significant growth inhibition was seen in all three treatment groups vs. the control group at 6 days post-injection of the first 2.5 μCi dose (Fig. 3). The second 2.5 μCi dose, given one week after the first dose, caused further growth inhibition, while the third dose (injected one week after the second dose) resulted in even further growth inhibition. However, the first dose caused the greatest inhibition, with each subsequent dose demonstrating diminishing levels of growth inhibition. The assessment of potential anticancer therapeutics using xenografted tumors in immunocompromised mice is difficult to standardize. Considering this experimental system, the observed level of tumor inhibition was dramatic, rapid and reproducible. This is reinforced by both how quickly and how significant the p‑values are that show the levels of inhibition are in comparing the group receiving the three doses of [32P]ATP to the control group (Fig. 4). A significant difference in growth inhibition continues for 25 d after the initial dose was given. In fact, the mice that received the three doses had average tumor volumes that were less than 58% of the control tumor volumes a month after the [32P]ATP was first begun to be administered.

Figure 3. Inhibition of xenografted tumor growth. HeLa cells (both left and right rear flanks) were used to establish xenografted tumors and were injected subcutaneously on Day 1. After the mice were randomized, one group received one dose of 2.5 µCi of [32P]ATP on day Day 9, one group received a 2.5 µCi dose on both Day 9 and on Day 16, and the third group received a 2.5 µCi dose on Day 9, on Day 16, and on Day 23. Each group had three mice and the tumor volumes were measured daily and compared with a control group of four mice that received no injection of [32P]ATP. Tumor volumes are in mm3.

Figure 4. The level of tumor growth inhibition in mice receiving three doses of 2.5 µCi [32P]ATP vs. the control group. A group of three mice, each bearing two HeLa-derived xenografted tumors, received a 2.5 µCi dose on Day 9, on Day 16, and on Day 23. The tumor volumes were measured daily and compared with a control group of four mice that received no injection of [32P]ATP. The mean and plus/minus one standard deviation is shown and the numbers are P values determined by the two-sided student’s t test. Tumor volumes are in mm3.

Discussion



The current report confirms that intravenous injection of low doses of [32P]ATP rapidly slows xenografted tumor growth in nude mice for several weeks, although the mechanism responsible for this reproducible finding is not yet understood. Our biodistribution results establish that although levels of [32P]ATP in tumors are initially low relative to normal organs, tumor levels decrease more slowly than in any other tissues. Unlike most potential anticancer drugs, which are based on antibodies or alien chemical compounds, ATP is relatively unique in that it is a completely natural compound, although the vast majority of ATP in humans is intracellular. The initial low level of [32P]ATP that was seen in the xenografted tumor was expected, because the tumors were essentially white in color, demonstrating inferior levels of vascularization when compared with the red blood-rich organs, such as the liver, kidney, heart and others. This inhibition of xenografted tumor may result from direct cytotoxic ability of the radioisotope, significant injury to B-cell lymphocytes and natural killer cells or, possibly, the well-documented phenomenon of low-dose radiation hypersensitivity.10 Hematoxylin and eosin staining of sections of the xenografted tumors showed no immune cells present in tumors from mice that received the highest doses of [32P]ATP, while the small, disrupted tumors examined from mice receiving optimal [32P]ATP doses did contain infiltrating immune cells (data not shown).

In the 1920s, Otto Warburg showed that tumor tissues metabolize glucose at a rate approximately ten times greater than do normal tissues under aerobic conditions.11,12 This finding became known as the Warburg effect and is centered on the mechanisms used by cancer cells to generate energy for the cell in the form of ATP, which was first discovered in 1929.11 The gamma phosphate of each ATP molecule is readily removed and restored over 1,000 times per day in the normal metabolic functions of cells, and the quantity of the ATP turnover is so great that it is roughly equal to a human’s total body weight.13

Inorganic elemental 32P has been used to treat essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera, and up to 15 mCi of inorganic 32P-sodium phosphate have been administered to each patient with chronic leukemia.14 Levels of organic 32P used here correspond, on a mouse to human weight basis, favorably to the levels of inorganic 32P that historically have been used previously to treat humans. In the United States, several ongoing clinical trials utilize inorganic 32P; moreover, nanotechnology approaches have been attempted to target this radioisotope against various cancer types. However, to our knowledge, organic 32P (as in [32P]ATP) has never been tested as a therapeutic agent in any disease.

Extracellular cold ATP occurs spontaneously at concentrations above 100 μM in xenografted mouse tumors, but it is undetectable in healthy tissues.15 Therefore, [32P]ATP may constitute a naturally targeted anticancer therapeutic agent, perhaps due to cancer-related inflammation and the energy-demanding extracellular tumor microenvironment.16 Additional potential advantages of [32P] ATP as an anticancer agent include its ready availability, low cost, ease of handling and transport. and relatively long half-life. Furthermore, there is the consensus that the smaller the anticancer molecule, the better the tumor penetration.17 In this context, [32P]ATP has a molecular weight of only 508 Daltons, making it much smaller than most anticancer agents. Finally, its apparent tumor-homing ability and the apparent requirement of the tumor microenvironment for exogenous ATP make [32P]ATP an attractive potential anticancer treatment strategy.

Acknowledgements



This work supported by GI SPORE Pilot Project Grant CA062924 and Grant CA133012. We wish to thank Theodore DeWeese for valuable input.

References



1. Goldsmith SJ. To ablate or not to ablate: issues and evidence involved in 131I ablation of residual thyroid tissue in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Semin Nucl Med 2011; 41:96-104; PMID: 21272683; DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2010.11.002.

2. Wiseman GA, Leigh B, Erwin WD, Lamonica D, Kornmehl E, Spies SM, et al. Radiation dosimetry results for Zevalin radioimmunotherapy of rituximab-refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 2002; 94:1349-57; PMID: 11877765; DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10305.

3. Horning SJ, Younes A, Jain V, Kroll S, Lucas J, Podoloff D, et al. Efficacy and safety of tositumomab and iodine-131 tositumomab (Bexxar) in B-cell lymphoma, progressive after rituximab. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:712-9; PMID: 15613695; DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.040.

4. Nisa L, Savelli G, Giubbini R. Yttrium-90 DOTATOC therapy in GEP-NET and other SST2 expressing tumors: a selected review. Ann Nucl Med 2011; 25:75-85; PMID: 21107762; DOI: 10.1007/s12149-010-0444-0.

5. Richmond A, Su Y. Mouse xenograft models vs GEM models for human cancer therapeutics. Dis Model Mech 2008; 1:78-82; PMID: 19048064; DOI: 10.1242/dmm.000976.

6. Morton CL, Houghton PJ. Establishment of human tumor xenografts in immunodeficient mice. Nat Protoc 2007; 2:247-50; PMID: 17406581; DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.25.

7. Wang T, Weigt SS, Belperio JA, Lynch JP. Immunosuppressive and cytotoxic therapy: pharmacology, toxicities, and monitoring. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 32:346-70; PMID: 21674420; DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1279831.

8. Mellor HR, Snelling S, Hall MD, Modok S, Jaffar M, Hambley TW, et al. The influence of tumour microenvironmental factors on the efficacy of cisplatin and novel platinum(IV) complexes. Biochem Pharmacol 2005; 70:1137-46; PMID: 16139250; DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.07.016.

9. Cheng Y, Yang J, Agarwal R, Green GM, Mease RC, Pomper MG, et al. Strong inhibition of xenografted tumor growth by low-level doses of [(32)P]ATP. Oncotarget 2011; 2:461-6; PMID: 21646686.

10. Krueger SA, Wilson GD, Piasentin E, Joiner MC, Marples B. The effects of G2-phase enrichment and checkpoint abrogation on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77:1509-17; PMID: 20637979; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.028.

11. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009; 324:1029-33; PMID: 19460998; DOI: 10.1126/science.1160809.

12. Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 2011; 11:325-37; PMID: 21508971; DOI: 10.1038/nrc3038.

13. Törnroth-Horsefield S, Neutze R. Opening and closing the metabolite gate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:19565-6; PMID: 19073922; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810654106.

14. Barbui T, Finazzi G. Treatment of polycythemia vera. Haematologica 1998; 83:143-9; PMID: 9549926.

15. Pellegatti P, Raffaghello L, Bianchi G, Piccardi F, Pistoia V, Di Virgilio F. Increased level of extracellular ATP at tumor sites: in vivo imaging with plasma membrane luciferase. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2599; PMID: 18612415; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002599.

16. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008; 454:436-44; PMID: 18650914; DOI: 10.1038/nature07205.

17. Patrick MR, Chester KA, Pietersz GA. In vitro characterization of a recombinant 32P-phosphorylated anti-(carcinoembryonic antigen) single-chain antibody. Cancer Immunol Immunother 1998; 46:229-37; PMID: 9671146; DOI: 10.1007/s002620050482.

Top
Back
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Jump to Section

Advertisements