Sign up for Table of Contents Alerts.
Email this page
Print this page
Research Paper
Molecular Profiling of Embryonal Carcinoma Cells Following Retinoic Acid or Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Treatment
Niquiche Sangster-Guity, Li-Ming Yu and Paulette McCormick
volume 3 | issue 11
november 2004Pages: 1109-1120
We now provide open access to journal articles published online for one year or more. This article may be downloaded at the following link:
Download PDFIf the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.
Regulation of tissue homeostasis is crucial to disease prevention; cell division, cell cycle arrest, differentiation and apoptosis have to be tightly controlled in order to maintain this homeostasis. Retinoic acid (RA) and the histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) have profound effects on these processes and thus may be critical regulators of homeostasis. Consequently, RA and/or histone deacetylase inhibitors are currently being tested in clinical trials for a variety of cancers. Unfortunately, little is known of the Regulation of tissue homeostasis is crucial to disease prevention; cell division, cell cycle arrest, differentiation and apoptosis have to be tightly controlled in order to maintain this homeostasis. Retinoic acid (RA) and the histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) have profound effects on these processes and thus may be critical regulators of homeostasis. Consequently, RA and/or histone deacetylase inhibitors are currently being tested in clinical trials for a variety of cancers. Unfortunately, little is known of the overall affect of these compounds on cellular gene expression. Therefore, we decided to compare the effects of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and a particular HDACI – Trichostatin A (TSA) - on an embryonal carcinoma (EC) cell line (F9) using gene chip analysis. We have focused particular attention on those genes that may be differentially affected by these compounds. Within the parameters established for this study, only 116 of the 12,488 genes examined were similarly regulated by ATRA and TSA: 75 positively and 41 negatively. An additional 70 genes were affected by only one of the compounds and 19 genes were actually inversely regulated. The gene set inversely regulated by ATRA and TSA includes several important patterning genes as well as the crucial tumor suppressor/promoter, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF?1). Promoter analysis suggests a motif that may regulate one set of these genes. This study provides the first comprehensive comparison of global gene expression on EC cells as affected by ATRA and a HDAC inhibitor (TSA); reveals new targets for ATRA and HDAC inhibitors; identifies a new regulatory motif; demonstrates that ATRA and HDAC inhibitors do not always act synergistically on gene expression; and examines particular questions regarding their concurrent clinical application.ral important patterning genes as well as the crucial tumor suppressor/promoter, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF?1). Promoter analysis suggests a motif that may regulate one set of these genes. This study provides the first comprehensive comparison of global gene expression on EC cells as affected by ATRA and a HDAC inhibitor (TSA); reveals new targets for ATRA and HDAC inhibitors; identifies a new regulatory motif; demonstrates that ATRA and HDAC inhibitors do not always act synergistically on gene expression; and examines particular questions regarding their concurrent clinical application.
We now provide open access to journal articles published online for one year or more. This article may be downloaded at the following link:
Download PDFIf the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.